{"id":1677,"date":"2020-08-16T03:48:40","date_gmt":"2020-08-16T03:48:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.globalagenttennis.com\/equality-on-the-tennis-court\/"},"modified":"2021-02-19T14:49:45","modified_gmt":"2021-02-19T14:49:45","slug":"equality-on-the-tennis-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.globalagenttennis.com\/en\/equality-on-the-tennis-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Equality on the tennis court"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The word equality itself, in the current sense, creates a social conflict, since it contradicts any aspect of the natural universe that surrounds us, in which no two things are the same. We can observe that, in all the inequality of the universe, each of its components exists and has its life cycle with the same rights as others; But we, men, wanted to be more intelligent than nature and to the fact that \u201ca wolf eats a sheep\u201d (to feed and survive) we have added laws by which \u201ca sheep can eat a wolf\u201d and \u201ca mouse he can taunt and kill a lion\u201d. We have created those laws like Frankenstein\u2019s father, thinking of equating our powers (and rights) to those of nature; but we have failed and our own creation is looking to us for revenge.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

But what is the point of equality in its true (even so rational) state? Let’s go back to Rome, to the Empire that has taught us so much about good and bad, and review one of its Gladiator Arena customs. On the tennis court there is a concept of equality that is identified with that time and place:<\/p>

Once in the arena, both an emperor and a slave have the same right to win.<\/em><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

What is equality on a tennis court<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
Yes, in tennis, both a world 1000 and a world 1 have the same right to win. That’s the Equality Law on the court. And may the best win! Work, preparation and mastery will define the outcome of the match. But modern society, which seeks inequality to find equality, leaves a gigantic gap in the education of young people (and not only young people) when it comes to teaching this value. This same concept is one of the most difficult to introduce into the conception of a player, since he arrives on the court with a radically contrary subconscious learning. The typical social learning that we give to young people (unconsciously) from teaching dictates the following:<\/div>